dc.contributor.author | Gaouda, Ahmed Fahmi | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-07-07T10:07:23Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-07-07T10:07:23Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020-02-25 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repository.limu.edu.ly/handle/123456789/1719 | |
dc.description | Breast cancer remains a significant threat to the health and wellness of women in the United States,
accounting for 30% of all new cancer diagnoses and almost 41,000 deaths annually(1). Although
advances in early detection and therapy have resulted in a 38% decrease in the breast cancer death
rate, almost all patients who develop metastatic disease will succumb to it. These sobering data
illustrate a critical need for innovative approaches to breast cancer therapy that reduce relapse and
death due to this disease. In recent years, accumulating data support a key role for the immune
system in determining both response to standard therapy and long-term survival in breast cancer
patients. Both these data and the striking clinical success of immune checkpoint antagonists across
multiple solid tumors have re-ignited interest in immune-based strategies for breast cancer
treatment and prevention. | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Immunotherapy is revolutionizing the management of multiple solid tumors, and early data have
revealed the clinical activity of PD-1/PD-L1 antagonists in small numbers of metastatic breast
cancer patients. Clinical activity appears more likely if the tumor is triple negative, PD-L1+, and/or
harbors higher levels of TILs. Responses to atezolizumab and pembrolizumab appear to be durable
in metastatic triple negative breast cancer (TNBC),suggesting these agents may transform the lives
of responding patients. Current clinical efforts are focused on developing immunotherapy
combinations that convert non-responders to responders, deepen those responses that do occur,
and surmount acquired resistance to immunotherapy. Identifying biomarkers that can predict the
potential for response to single agent immunotherapy, identify the best immunotherapy
combinations for a particular patient, and guide salvage immunotherapy in patients with
progressive disease are high prioritiesfor clinical development. Smart clinical trialstesting rational
immunotherapy combinations that include robust biomarker evaluations will accelerate clinical
progress, moving us closer to effective immunotherapy for almost all breast cancer patients. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | faculty of Basic Medical Science - Libyan International Medical University | en_US |
dc.rights | Attribution 3.0 United States | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/ | * |
dc.title | Immunotherapy for breast cancer | en_US |
dc.type | Other | en_US |